Safinaz H. Fahmy , Mai M. Akah And Mona Ismail Riad,

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The Study Aim Was To Evaluate The Retention Rate Of Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Compared To Conventional Resin-based Flowable Composite During Management Of Initial Non Cavitated Pits And Fissures Carious Lesion In Adult Population Over A One-year Period. Methods: A Total Of 19 Volunteer Patients Ranging In Age From 18 To 28 Years, Diagnosed With At Least 2 Non-cavitated Pit-and-fissure Caries In The First And Second Molars Were Selected For This Randomized Split-mouth Design Trial. A Total Of 38 Sealants, Were Placed. The Teeth Were Sealed With NovaPro? Flow Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber Reinforced Flowable Composite In One Side, While Filtek? Z350 XT Flowable Conventional Resin-based Composite On The Contralateral. Each Restoration Was Independently Evaluated In Terms Of Retention Rate At 1, 6, And 12 Months. Data Were Analyzed Using Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test And Friedman?s Test At P < 0.05.

Results: NovaPro? Flow Hydroxyapatite Showed Complete Retention With 100% At 1, 6, Month Evaluation Periods, While Filtek? Z350 XT Retention Rates Were 100%, 78.9%, Respectively, For The Same Evaluation Periods. At The 12-month Recall, 2 (10.5%) Total Losses Were Observed In Subjects Treated With NovaPro? Flow And 2 Total Losses (15.8%) For Filtek? Z350 XT. No Statistical Significant Difference In The Retention Rate In Both Sealants During Different Follow-up Intervals (P>0.05)

Conclusions: The Retention Rate Of Both Hydroxyapatite Nanofibers Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite And The Conventional Nanofilled Flowable Resin Composite After One Year Of Follow Up Was Comparable. Clinical Relevance: The Clinical Survival Rate Of Both Tested Materials May Indicate Them As Effective Approaches For Preventing Carious Lesions In Permanent Teeth.